EVE Search - Who supports my agenda?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

Who supports my agenda?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Serenity Steele Dynamic Data Distribution	Posted - 2009.11.13 16:07:00 - [1] Becq, I think your issue is totally valid, and in fact outside of CSM I've been privately working on a player project to put the RP back into FW. The combination of FW and RP is a great untapped opportunity for some awesome player experience, not only for existing players, but as a theme to bring more new players to the EVE Universe. ≡v≡ Strategic Maps in Eve-Online Store. CSM 4 Candidate - Vote for Serenity Steele
Serenity Steele Dynamic Data Distribution	Posted - 2009.11.14 00:01:00 - [2] Originally by: Becq Starforged What is this "FW is a stepping stone into 0.0" nonsense? By keeping a rigid wall between FW and the rest of Eve, you are creating the opposite effect, divorcing the two sandboxes completely... I can't support an idea that would allow 0.0 alliance of highly skilled players to go on a killing spree in FW and get LP's for that, without some practical barriers. It is important to remember that the only functions that alliance mechanic provides are: - Easy management of standings - Consolidated war-decs and later - The ability claim sovereignty - Access to jump bridges Prior to the implementation of the alliance mechanic, there were many functional alliances within EVE. Stain Alliance & BoB to name a few. Almost all alliances went further to create holding corps to manage alliance finances as there is no supported game mechanic for alliance wallet. Take all this together with the introduction of treaties Soon(tm), and we have a mechanic for dealing with this, without allowing alliances into FW; Setup an alliance holding corporation which is the alliance, provide treaties to all the FW corporations and manual management of inter-FW corp standings. Looking at this whole description, it's a work-around, so the question becomes; what could be done to make it easy? eg. By providing a supporting feature "Mirror standings of corporation X" (ie the holding corporation) you would have alliances in FW. If a lot of alliances are structured in this way, it would show it's important to EVE Players, and therefor get support for game mechanics to make it easier. So; 2 options - the CSM (as I would) can support mechanic solutions now and there is a way to achieve it today to show support from a player perspective. ≡v≡ Strategic Maps in Eve-Online Store. CSM 4 Candidate - Vote for Serenity Steele

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.